Waiting For Lefty

As the U.S. economy seemingly collapsed overnight last October, the Great Depression haunted us again ... and there's no playwright who encapsulates that era better than Clifford Odets. He is to the theatre what Woody Guthrie is to music or Dorothea Lange is to photography: the poet of a national trauma. It's a trauma that still obviously haunts us as this past fall became filled with ghosts of Hoovertowns and bread lines. Waiting for Lefty immediately came to mind as I looked at "The State We're In", and became first on the list as I thought about this project.

I've read Waiting for Lefty before. When I assistant directed a production of Awake and Sing! in the early nineties, I tore though most of Odets' complete works very quickly in an effort to be prepared. It was a long time ago, however and this read was a very fresh experience. I was surprised by its brevity, its power, and its focused mixture of hope and rage. In its basic examination of how massive economic forces impact the individual (and what the individual can do about it), Waiting for Lefty is a timeless story that feels like it could be happening today ... but there's another aspect that feels antiquated and outdated and "period".

In a modern production, how do you come to grips with Lefty's fervent passion for Soviet Communism? Odets joined the American Communist Party in 1934, and Lefty is flush with admiration for the movement. This is no theoretical Communism: Dr. Benjamin speaks clearly about wanting to go to Russia, to work in their socialized medicine system. It's hard to imagine that had these characters had been able to see behind the Iron Curtain they would have been so passionate about the cause. Soviet Communism was not the ennobling force for the worker's good that it appeared from the outside, so how does that historical truth inform a modern reading?

It cannot simply be ignored. Though actors, directors and designers could decide on a "pure" production ... the audience knows. There is no way to simply inhabit the wide-eyed optimism Odets and his characters felt. The play changes and darkens as a result, becoming a politicized Waiting for Godot where the only salvation lies in the dream of another life, but that salvation is all illusion (or delusion). Communism will not come to the rescue of people like Joe and Edna or Sid and Florence. All the hope rings hollow, and Lefty becomes far bleaker even than it must have appeared to a Broadway audience in 1935.

Next Week: The Guys by Anne Nelson

7 comments:

January 5, 2009 at 10:26 AM Anonymous said...

I agree with you that, if one does a modern production, everything the theatre personnel and its audience knows about Soviet Russia changes the play-- but that is always going to be the way it is with any historical work. All the ensuing years create new meaning in every crevice of every older play. Ubu is a completely different play after Bush, Endgame is different after America's new experience with and obsession with terrorism, the ending of A Doll's House makes no sense post-feminism-- I have to painstakingly contextualize it for my students.

It's no secret that I'm a big believer in new work, so I would say that the main interest in Waiting for Lefty, like many plays of the past that have become nearly unstageable due to time (Merchant of Venice, much of O'Neill and his rampant misogyny, and the icky portrayal of women in The Skin of Our Teeth all spring to mind but of course there are many more) is a purely historical one. I wouldn't bother trying to come up with a staging solution for the fervent admiration of Communism-- I'd far prefer to do a new play that addresses the same issues instead.

As a theatre community, we spend far too much time revisiting older works-- and I say this with love as someone who spends much of her time directing Shakespeare. On the other hand, Impact fills the rest of our season with new plays by emerging playwrights. There are dozens upon dozens of straight up brilliant emerging playwrights who are getting far less attention than they deserve because we're all working too hard, as a community, on our revivals. Obviously I don't believe that Our Town should never be done again (perhaps that's a bad example, but you get my meaning), but I believe that the ratio of new plays to revivals should be reversed. Less Wilder, O'Neill, Pinter, and Miller (all of whose relevance to contemporary life is metaphorical, tangential and interpretive) and more Sheila Callaghan, Peter Sinn Nachtrieb, Prince Gomolvilas, Julia Cho, Enrique Urueta, Lauren Yee, Steven Yockey, Dan Dietz, Carlos Murillo, Jeff Sweet, Jeremy Kareken, Greg Romero, Elizabeth Meriwether, and on and on and on. While I'm a huge history dork, and plays of the past feed that quite nicely, I'm more interested as a contemporary producer in plays that are being written as a direct reflection of our society by people currently living in it, and I'm even more rabid about that because these writers get far, far less attention than they deserve. For every Sheila Callaghan there are 60 brazillion Crucibles, and Sheila is one of the most gifted American playwrights alive-- no lie.

OMG I am so glad you're doing this! This conversation is TOO much fun. The only thing that would make it better is if the two of us and your wife were all sitting in a bar having it face to face.

I've never read The Guys and I'm not sure I'll be able to get my hands on it-- the quarter starts today, as well as rehearsals for Midsummer, so my schedule is a little nutty, but if I can swing it, I'll read it.

Again, thanks for doing this. You're a superhero!

January 5, 2009 at 10:47 AM Mark Fossen said...

I am a believer in new work, but SLC is an odd scene. It is - as far as serious theatre goes - almost exclusively new work. In many markets the push for new work is a revolt against the old guard. SLAC and Plan-B generally do premiers (Plan-B with developed work, SLAC with regional premiers). Outside of that it's largely community theatre - musicals and light comedies. So "old" plays are a complete exception here.

While I love new plays, I think there needs to be a place for classic work outside of historical interest. Theatre is ephemeral enough - I like the idea that scripts can last and find new facets in them. Frankly, I think Lefty may be a more interesting work now than in 1935.

I need to come back to your list as I build a year of playreading. I definitely lost touch for a long time there, and I want to strike a balance between "classic" stuff and new work.

January 5, 2009 at 4:21 PM Anonymous said...

We have a lot of new work here-- the Bay Area does 300 world premiere plays a year-- but we still see so, so, so much of the old, tired stuff done in old, tired ways. I agree that older plays can be stageworthy-- we do one classic a year, so I do put my money where my mouth is, so to speak-- but I think that often an older play is done because it's a lazy choice, or it's trying to pander. I think there's a difference between what you're talking about-- which is choosing an older play because of its sudden new relevance and framing-- and what I'm talking about, which is making lazy choices and doing older plays because you need to keep your subscriber base happy; having no real artistic vision or need to do the play. The biggest dogs in the East Bay are Berkeley Rep and the Aurora and I think they do a healthy, interesting mix, so we're lucky there, but overall throughout the nation and of course in NYC we see far too many lazy and/or purely moneymaking choices.

February 17, 2009 at 10:24 AM Unknown said...

This would be my second reading of this play. (I saw a production of it years ago, but don't remember much about it.) But every time I read it, I'm amazed at the need it creates in me to keep reading. That may sound odd, but while Pinter is known for his notorious "pause" I find that I just drive through the thing and feel emotionally spent at the end. Not just for myself, but for every character in the play.

I would love to direct this play some day. Maybe with a dream cast like J, M and A. (pause) Ahhhh . . .

February 17, 2009 at 12:02 PM Mark Fossen said...

This got stuck onto Lefty, but I think you're talking about Betrayal.

That would be a hell of a cast, Kyle.

September 25, 2009 at 6:23 PM GregRomero said...

I like that I made this list. How did that happen?

thanks,

Greg ROMERO

September 27, 2009 at 2:46 PM Melissa said...

Because it's me, Romero!

-- Melissa Hillman

Post a Comment