
Excepting, of course, that the theatre already has its own Woody Allen.
... I suppose he's like the theatre's own Catholic Woody Allen.
So, then: The Actor’s Nightmare
Actually, this reading was .... refreshing. Given some distance I was able to see the play differently, with clearer eyes. Too often the play (and a lot of Durang) strikes me as a tiresome exercise in theatre in-jokes combined with intellectual snobbery and more than a soupçon of New-York-Is-The-Center-Of-Reality that relies on us all patting ourselves on the back about how educated and cultured we are. (Need I mention the Catholic guilt and therapy for aforesaid Catholic guilt? .... I needn't.)
But this time through ... boy, if you stripped away the low-budget community theatre trappings and really threw some design at the piece, you could have something, couldn't you? A surreal phantasmagoria that could be a fun head trip for the audience ... a comic Strindberg. Imagine playing more to the Nightmare than the Actor, looking at the mindscape of a guilt-ridden theater aficionado.
... Of course you'd still be left with a slight one-act that doesn't have a story arc or a point other than Catholic guilt and theater references. But it'd be pretty to look at!
0 comments:
Post a Comment