
Why? Why would this seemingly dense play about architecture and genius and the weight of family history become fodder for film stars showing off their stage chops?
It actually makes a lot of sense it McAvoy's case, as the central role of Walker/Ned is a powerhouse that contains a lot of theatrical pyrotechnics. From madly expressive chaos to stuttering repression, it's a showcase piece for the actor that can pull it off. Roberts' decision to work on the project is more confusing, as her role doesn't contain near the splash ... but perhaps that's the point. Trading on her likability, Three Days of Rain would make an excellent way for her to establish her stage bona fides in a piece laden with the trappings of intelligentsia ... but without actually having to shoulder too much weight.
... And the play is funny. Actual, honest-to-god, laugh-out-loud funny. In a tradition spaning from Wilde to Coward to Aaron Sorkin and Joss Whedon, Greenberg is writing smart, witty people who say smart, witty things, and it really works. What could easily become a maudlin work crackles with snap and fun and joy in the playing, and that was completely surprising to me. I imagine it plays like a house on fire, and I'm looking forward to seeing it in August.
0 comments:
Post a Comment